GRID K160Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

When choosing between GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

GRID K160Q

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	4−5
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	12−14
medium / 1080p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	1−2	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	16−18
medium / 1080p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	75−80	85−90
ultra / 1080p	30−35	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	9−10	−
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	6−7	12−14
medium / 1080p	1−2	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 43% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	18−20
medium / 1080p	3−4	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	40−45
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
ultra / 1080p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	8−9
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
high / 1080p	50−55	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	16−18
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	2−3	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	80−85
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
high / 768p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name	GK107	Broadwell GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	2 June 2015
Pipelines	192	48
Core clock speed	850 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	40.80
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	883.2 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares