GRID K160Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 1125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 172% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 360% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 757% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GK107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |