GRID K160Q vs P104 100
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
P104 100
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P104 100 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 757 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8226 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K160Q and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK107 | GP104 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |