GRID K160Q vs Quadro K2000D

When comparing GRID K160Q and Quadro K2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro K2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 154% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000D has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K2000D are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 104 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	18−20
medium / 1080p	1−2	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	2−3	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	9−10	27−30
high / 768p	50−55	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	6−7	21−24
medium / 1080p	1−2	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 100% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	5−6
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	2−3	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
high / 768p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	1 March 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	850 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	30.53
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length		202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		31 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares