GRID K160Q vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

GRID K160Q

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K160Q has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 183 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3230 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	1−2	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−35	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	85−90
4K / 2160p	9−10	45−50
high / 768p	50−55	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	14−16	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 155% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	50−55
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	120−130
medium / 1080p	3−4	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	10−12	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	70−75
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	40−45
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	19 July 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	850 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	26.68
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GRID K160Q vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares