GRID K160Q vs Quadro K4000

In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K160Q

Quadro K4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 62% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4000 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 40 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 3834 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	9−10	27−30
medium / 1080p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	8−9	45−50
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	100−110	200−210
medium / 768p	75−80	170−180
ultra / 1080p	30−35	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	50−55	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	90−95
ultra / 1080p	14−16	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	90−95
medium / 1080p	3−4	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−105
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	30−35
high / 768p	27−30	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K4000
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	1 March 2013
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	51.84
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		61 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro K4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares