GRID K160Q vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro K4100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 144 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 1418 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 182% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 70% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |