GRID K160Q vs Quadro K5200

When comparing GRID K160Q and Quadro K5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro K5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro K5200 has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K5200 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K5200 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 183 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K5200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 4226 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	9−10	60−65
medium / 1080p	1−2	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	1−2	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	2−3	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	250−260
medium / 768p	75−80	220−230
ultra / 1080p	30−35	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	9−10	70−75
high / 768p	50−55	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GRID K160Q and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	110−120
ultra / 1080p	14−16	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	6−7	80−85
medium / 1080p	1−2	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	40−45	180−190
medium / 1080p	3−4	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	10−12	100−110
medium / 1080p	3−4	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	1−2	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	50−55
high / 768p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K5200
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK110B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	2304
Core clock speed	850 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	148.0
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares