GRID K160Q vs Quadro P520
When comparing GRID K160Q and Quadro P520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro P520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P520 here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Quadro P520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P520 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P520 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P520 is 453 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P520 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P520 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Fortnite is 160% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 328% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Quadro P520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK107 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |