GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
When comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 170 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 882 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 1050% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 95−100 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 160% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 714% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Blackcomb XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2x1700 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |