GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro 450
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 450, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against Radeon Pro 450, check out specs charts below.
GRID K160Q
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 271% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 450 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3298 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 115% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 442% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |