GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro 555
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 555, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 555.
GRID K160Q
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 555 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3298 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 132% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 252% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |