GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 618 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 680% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 1150% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 205% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 172% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 369% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 785% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 137% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1866% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
| Code name | GK107 | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |