GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 20
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 20, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 20.
GRID K160Q
Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 20 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 20 here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 35 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 302 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 20 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro Vega 20 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | GK107 | Vega Mobile |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 815 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1283 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 102.6 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 189.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |