GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro W5500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro W5500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro W5500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q has 52% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 725% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 115% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 226% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1066% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |