GRID K160Q vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 271% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |