GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 250

When comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		N/A
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 250 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 632 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
ultra / 1080p	0−1	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	14−16
medium / 1080p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	1−2	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	18−20
medium / 1080p	2−3	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	9−10	−
high / 768p	50−55	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	65−70	80−85
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	6−7	14−16
medium / 1080p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	10−12	21−24
medium / 1080p	3−4	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	45−50
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	2−3
ultra / 1080p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	9−10
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
high / 1080p	50−55	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	18−20
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	2−3	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
high / 768p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK107	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 October 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	25.20
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length		168 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares