GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 360

In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GRID K160Q Radeon R7 360
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 100 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 360.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Radeon R7 360 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 360 - with GCN 2.0.
  • GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 360 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 16−18
ultra / 1080p 0−1 9−10
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 9−10 30−35
medium / 1080p 1−2 20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

  GRID K160Q Radeon R7 360
Architecture Kepler GCN 2.0
Code name GK107 Tobago
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 28 June 2013 18 June 2015
Pipelines 192 768
Core clock speed 850 MHz
Boost Clock 1000 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 13.60 50.40
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 1,613 gflops
Length 165 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s 112 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA 3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.2 kh/s
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 225 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.29 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 10 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 102 Sol/s
  Check Price