GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 130 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK107 | Kaveri Spectre |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 14 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |