GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R7 M365X
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 782 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Litho |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |