GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 M465X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M465X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M465X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R7 M465X
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M465X has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 2718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 108% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Tropo |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |