GRID K160Q vs Radeon R8 M535DX
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon R8 M535DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R8 M535DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R8 M535DX
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 70 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M535DX.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R8 M535DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 891 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 17.82 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |