GRID K160Q vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 1778 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | no data |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |