GRID K160Q vs Radeon R9 M270X

When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M270X.

GRID K160Q

Radeon R9 M270X

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R9 M270X
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 M270X has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 657 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	0−1	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	16−18
medium / 1080p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	24−27
medium / 1080p	2−3	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
medium / 768p	75−80	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	9−10	27−30
high / 768p	50−55	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	65−70	75−80
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	6−7	18−20
medium / 1080p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 82% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	24−27
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	4−5
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
high / 1080p	50−55	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	24−27
medium / 768p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	30−35	40−45
ultra / 1080p	10−11	18−20
high / 768p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R9 M270X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK107	Venus
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	21 March 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	850 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		775 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	31.00
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,536 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	72 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0 x16
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R9 M270X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares