GRID K160Q vs Radeon R9 M280X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M280X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M280X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 M280X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M280X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Fortnite is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 M280X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK107 | Saturn XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 February 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |