GRID K160Q vs Radeon R9 M395X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M395X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M395X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 92% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 127 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 532 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 205% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 172% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 404% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 828% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 137% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1966% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GK107 | Amethyst XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |