GRID K160Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 is 81 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
| Code name | GK107 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 7 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |