GRID K160Q vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
GRID K160Q
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 90% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1350 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
9−10
35−40
medium / 1080p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
8−9
55−60
medium / 1080p
2−3
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
100−110
210−220
medium / 768p
75−80
190−200
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
9−10
30−35
high / 768p
50−55
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
35−40
100−110
ultra / 1080p
14−16
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
6−7
45−50
medium / 1080p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
110−120
medium / 1080p
3−4
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 282% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
10−12
60−65
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 571% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
35−40
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
0−1
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
3−4
60−65
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
35−40
high / 768p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q.
Full Specs
GRID K160Q
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK107
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
850 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
32.14
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
