GRID K160Q vs Tesla M6
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Tesla M6.
GRID K160Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than Tesla M6.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3230 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1040% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 1900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 250% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K160Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 1650% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 595% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1228% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 94% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |