GRID K160Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K160Q

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	9−10	30−33
medium / 1080p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	8−9	45−50
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	200−210
medium / 768p	75−80	170−180
ultra / 1080p	30−35	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	9−10	24−27
high / 768p	50−55	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	90−95
ultra / 1080p	14−16	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	3−4	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 226% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	30−35
high / 768p	27−30	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK107	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares