GRID K160Q vs GRID K2

When comparing GRID K160Q and GRID K2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and GRID K2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

GRID K2 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	GRID K2
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K2 has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K2 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q and GRID K2 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K2.
GRID K160Q and GRID K2 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K2 is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	9−10	30−35
medium / 1080p	1−2	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p	100−110	210−220
medium / 768p	75−80	180−190
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	55−60
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	95−100
ultra / 1080p	14−16	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Dota 2 is 132% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	3−4	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Fortnite is 252% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	10−12	55−60
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1266% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	GRID K2
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	11 May 2013
Pipelines	192	1536
Core clock speed	850 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	95.36
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	2x 2,289 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		114 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs GRID K2

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares