GRID K2 vs NVS 810

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K2 and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K2 stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.

GRID K2 Check Price

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K2	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	8x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GRID K2 has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K2 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K2 is build with Kepler architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 157 MHz higher, than GRID K2.
GRID K2 and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K2 is 69 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of GRID K2 is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	20−22	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	100−110	40−45
QHD / 1440p	55−60	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−35	16−18
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	95−100	45−50
ultra / 1080p	65−70	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	10−12
medium / 1080p	21−24	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	27−30	10−11
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Fortnite is 187% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	27−30	5−6
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	2−3
low / 720p	55−60	18−20
medium / 1080p	30−35	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	4−5
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Minecraft is 22% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	30−35	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	60−65	10−11
medium / 768p	35−40	8−9
high / 1080p	20−22	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	GRID K2	NVS 810
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	11 May 2013	4 November 2015
Pipelines	1536	512
Core clock speed	745 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock		1033 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	33.06
Floating-point performance	2x 2,289 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	267 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	114 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GRID K2 vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares