GRID K2 vs Quadro K620M
When choosing between GRID K2 and Quadro K620M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K2 and Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
GRID K2
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GRID K2 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
GRID K2 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K2 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
GRID K2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K2 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K2.
GRID K2 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K2 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
3−4
ultra / 1080p
9−10
1−2
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K2 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−110
45−50
QHD / 1440p
55−60
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
high / 768p
140−150
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
95−100
55−60
ultra / 1080p
65−70
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
18−20
3−4
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
55−60
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
27−30
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
6−7
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
60−65
16−18
medium / 768p
35−40
12−14
high / 1080p
20−22
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
GRID K2
Quadro K620M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK104
GM108
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
11 May 2013
1 March 2015
Pipelines
1536
384
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
17.98
Floating-point performance
2x 2,289 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
114 Mh/s
92 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
