FirePro M4150 vs GRID K220Q
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID K220Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GRID K220Q.
FirePro M4150
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| FirePro M4150 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | GK104 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |