FirePro M7740 vs GRID K220Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M7740 and GRID K220Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M7740 and GRID K220Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 275% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 95 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Kepler |
| Code name | RV740 | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |