FirePro S7150 vs GRID K220Q
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and GRID K220Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and GRID K220Q.
FirePro S7150
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K220Q has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro S7150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 504 GB more memory, than FirePro S7150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 175 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- FirePro S7150 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 and GRID K220Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7150 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S7150 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK104 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |