FirePro S9050 vs GRID K220Q
In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and GRID K220Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others GRID K220Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
GRID K220Q
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
512 MB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K220Q has 500 GB more memory, than FirePro S9050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
FirePro S9050 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 500 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
1−2
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
24−27
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
12−14
medium / 1080p
35−40
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro S9050 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
110−120
medium / 768p
200−210
85−90
ultra / 1080p
110−120
35−40
QHD / 1440p
85−90
−
4K / 2160p
45−50
10−11
high / 768p
160−170
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
14−16
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
40−45
ultra / 1080p
80−85
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
9−10
medium / 1080p
27−30
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
5−6
QHD / 1440p
14−16
1−2
low / 720p
120−130
45−50
medium / 1080p
70−75
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 293% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
30−35
3−4
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
35−40
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
100−110
40−45
medium / 768p
90−95
−
high / 1080p
40−45
3−4
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
1−2
ultra / 1080p
10−11
0−1
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
3−4
medium / 1080p
16−18
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
55−60
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
4−5
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
7−8
medium / 768p
45−50
6−7
high / 1080p
24−27
3−4
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 860% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
12−14
high / 768p
55−60
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GRID K220Q.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
GRID K220Q
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
7 August 2014
2 July 2014
Pipelines
1792
1536
Core clock speed
900 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
95.36
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
