FirePro W9000 vs GRID K220Q
In this comparison between FirePro W9000 and GRID K220Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W9000 will be the best choice, for others GRID K220Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
FirePro W9000
GRID K220Q
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
512 MB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
No outputs
Check Price
FirePro W9000 has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K220Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K220Q has 506 GB more memory, than FirePro W9000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 230 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
FirePro W9000 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 500 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
1−2
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
10−12
medium / 1080p
40−45
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
3−4
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
12−14
medium / 1080p
60−65
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W9000 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
110−120
medium / 768p
220−230
85−90
ultra / 1080p
180−190
35−40
QHD / 1440p
110−120
−
4K / 2160p
70−75
10−11
high / 768p
210−220
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
FirePro W9000 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
110−120
40−45
ultra / 1080p
100−110
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
45−50
2−3
ultra / 1080p
40−45
2−3
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
0−1
low / 720p
80−85
9−10
medium / 1080p
45−50
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
27−30
1−2
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
45−50
medium / 1080p
110−120
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
60−65
3−4
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
0−1
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
14−16
medium / 1080p
65−70
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
140−150
40−45
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
3−4
ultra / 1080p
30−35
2−3
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
1−2
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
3−4
medium / 1080p
30−35
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
130−140
85−90
high / 1080p
−
55−60
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
4−5
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
130−140
7−8
medium / 768p
85−90
6−7
high / 1080p
45−50
3−4
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
50−55
12−14
high / 768p
60−65
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q.
Full Specs
FirePro W9000
GRID K220Q
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
14 June 2012
2 July 2014
Pipelines
2048
1536
Core clock speed
975 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
124.8
95.36
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
460 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
