FireStream 9370 vs GRID K220Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GRID K220Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GRID K220Q, check out specs charts below.

FireStream 9370

GRID K220Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K220Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	10−12
medium / 1080p	16−18	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	3−4
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	12−14
medium / 1080p	21−24	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	190−200	110−120
medium / 768p	160−170	85−90
ultra / 1080p	85−90	35−40
QHD / 1440p	45−50	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	120−130	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	85−90	40−45
ultra / 1080p	55−60	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	14−16	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	9−10
medium / 1080p	16−18	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	85−90	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 180% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	3−4
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	75−80	40−45
medium / 768p	65−70	−
high / 1080p	24−27	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−11	2−3
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	8−9	1−2
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	3−4
medium / 1080p	10−12	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	4−5
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	45−50	7−8
medium / 768p	27−30	6−7
high / 1080p	16−18	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
high / 768p	50−55	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than GRID K220Q.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K220Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Cypress	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	2 July 2014
Pipelines	1600	1536
Core clock speed	825 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FireStream 9370 vs GRID K220Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares