GeForce 940MX vs GRID K220Q
When comparing GeForce 940MX and GRID K220Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940MX and GRID K220Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 878% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 377 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 60% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |