GeForce GT 750M vs GRID K220Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 750M and GRID K220Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 750M stacks up against GRID K220Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K220Q
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M and GRID K220Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 222 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce GT 750M and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 48% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |