GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GRID K220Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K220Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K220Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID K220Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 195 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 4050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 47% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 95% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 34% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID K220Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 2 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 224 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |