GeForce MX110 vs GRID K220Q
When comparing GeForce MX110 and GRID K220Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX110 and GRID K220Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX110 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
- GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 220 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce MX110 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX110 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |