GeForce MX150 vs GRID K220Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX150 and GRID K220Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX150 and GRID K220Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 723 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce MX150 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 81% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |