GeForce MX250 vs GRID K220Q
When choosing between GeForce MX250 and GRID K220Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX250 and GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 773 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 186% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |