GeForce MX350 vs GRID K220Q
When comparing GeForce MX350 and GRID K220Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX350 and GRID K220Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 1025% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 609 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 111% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 220% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |