GeForce MX450 vs GRID K220Q
When choosing between GeForce MX450 and GRID K220Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX450 and GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 650 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 5002 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |