GRID K220Q vs GRID K240Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K220Q and GRID K240Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K220Q and GRID K240Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GRID K220Q and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q and GRID K240Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 115% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 44% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |