GRID K220Q vs HD Graphics 4400
When comparing GRID K220Q and HD Graphics 4400, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and HD Graphics 4400 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | HD Graphics 4400 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 1025% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 4400 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 4400 - in Laptops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 4400 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 545 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 4400 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 450% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Dota 2 is 58% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Fortnite is 113% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| GRID K220Q and HD Graphics 4400 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in World of Tanks is 88% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | HD Graphics 4400 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 20 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 46 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |