GRID K220Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing GRID K220Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K220Q vs GeForce 920A
- GRID K220Q vs Radeon R7 M365X
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 920A
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 M365X
- GRID K220Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GRID K220Q vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M